Were Dalits prohibited from drinking water from wells in ancient times? Is there any evidence to support this claim?

Avarnas were people who were perceived to be doing ritually unclean jobs - not necessarily actual unclean jobs. For example, Toddy tappers were considered impure. Because, toddy tapping was considered impure.

When Ambedkar became a professor of political economy in the Sydenham College of Commerce and Economics in Mumbai, other professors objected to his sharing a drinking-water jug with them.

The medieval Chōla era the indigenous early settlers were relegated to the status of Avarnas and they were given space to live outside villages and towns. They had separate ponds, cremation grounds, so as to not ritually pollute others.

Which document should be pointed out to a holocaust denier?

Pre modern times :

I read another answer which is nothing but apologetics for the evil system. The OP claims :

Inscription granted certain privileges to the professional people called Sayakars of Idalakkudi viz.,

S.W.A.T. Vet Jay Harrington Breaks Silence on EXILES Surprise: ‘I Did Not Have Spinoff on My Bingo Card’ (Exclusive) - TVLine

"they are prohibited from drawing water from the wells of other castes; but have particular wells of their own near their inhabitations, round which they place the bones of animals, that they may be known and avoided.

Every house had a well and no one stopped Dalits so on.

On March 20, 1927, Ambedkar and his followers marched to the Chavdar Lake, where he drank water from it, asserting their right of equality and equal access to public resources.

My boyfriend wants to break up over too many petty arguments. To me, they are molehills because I truly love him & don't really think twice about them. If he loved me would he work through it?

North or South, East or west - you can find Dalits facing the same issues when it comes to fetching water from common wells and ponds.

When an Indian of any other caste permits a Paraiya to speak to him, this unfortunate being is obliged to hold his hand before his mouth, lest the Indian may be contaminated with his ​breath; and, if he Is met on the highway, he must turn on one side to let the other pass.

Medieval inscription time to time record caste disputes.

How One Keto Trial Set Off a New War in the Nutrition World - WIRED

If any Indian whatever, even a Choutre, by accident touches a Paraiya, he is obliged to purify himself in a bath.

From ‘Castes and tribes of India’ :

They were exempted from the payment of all dues with the exception of Padaippanam and Kappalvagai panam.

Do you even realise that NASA could've hid or bury every single piece of evidence for a flat-earth and exaggerate their evidence? Have you ever question materialist scientific narratives?

So no matter what job the Avarnas choose , their touch was/is considered impure by casteists who stick to the practice of ritual purity.

Shockingly, the practice of keeping away Dalits from common wells, continues to this day in some places.

The girl replies, ‘I am a Chandali’

Why did my ex-narcissist move so fast with his new supply marriage engagement moving in, etc.?

They were freed from persecution at the hands of Brahmins, Pillaimars and others who were in the habit of obstructing their passage to take water from tanks and wells, by putting up fences of thorns etc, assaulting and exacting unreasonable dues from them and interfering with and interrupting them in their public religious performances. Their residence was also prescribed within certain limits.

They were allowed to appear before the sovereign during the royal processions.

Where ever the concept of Varnashrama and ritual purity spread, this was the situation.

To prevent blackouts, Trump administration keeps another aging power plant online through summer - AP News

Even if a Dalit didn’t engage in any said impure activity or job, he or she would still be denied access to common well, because by birth they are considered to be ritually impure.

Hope these modern so called Shudra priests actually learn the history of discrimination in the subcontinent instead of doing apologetics.

Source : Travancore Manual, Volume I, page number 196.

I’m 17 and looking for a girl. What do I do?

Even as recently as 18th century, the custom of keeping away Dalits from the common wells was in practice.

And,

I am not sure whether Sayakkars were classified as Avarnas, but they were harassed for taking water from tanks and wells. The issue was taken before the government and they were given retrieve.

What are the most common signs that a partner will cheat before it happens?

One of the caste Hindus told ‘The Hindu’:

They (Dalits) can ask any of us to fetch the water for them and we will oblige. But they cannot do it on their own. This practice has been there for ages and it cannot be changed,”

In December 1937, the Bombay High Court ruled that untouchables have the right to use water from the tank. It took ten years for the Dalits to get justice.

Pokémon Cafe’s new Mega Charizard curry plate is a work of art in more ways than one - SoraNews24

Yes. Avarnas were generally prohibited from deinking or fetching water from common wells and ponds. They had their separate wells and ponds.

Mahad Satyagraha -

And that Dalits dealt with corpses that’s why others fetched water for them.

Increased Toxicity Risk Identified For Children With ADHD, Autism - ScienceAlert

A note on the Paraiyans, Sonnerat, writing in the eighteenth century, says that,

The text itself is variously dated from 2nd century CE to 4th century CE, but the legends are believed to be older.

Evidence of this practice comes from early Buddhist literature. The story of Ananda and the Chandali girl Prakrit is an example. The story is found in Divyavadana - a collection of early Buddhist legends.

Why do people keep saying they have evidence and have presented it that proves you're wrong even though they have none and haven't presented anything? Furthermore, what do they think you're wrong about?

The well the girl was using is meant for Avarnas. The touch of an avarna is considered impure and hence she hesitates giving water to Ananda.

One such dispute is recorded in a granite pillar in the Parasuraman Peruntheru, Idalakudi, Nagercoil, dated to 661 M.E (Malayalam Era), that is 1486 AD

History stands as a testimony to the atrocities committed on the oppressed section.

There were Paraicheri for Paraiyars, Kammalancheri for Kammalas, Ilai Cheri for toddy tappers so on. Some inscriptions mention Theendacheri (untouchable hanlet) - the term Cheri is still in use and is usually a reference to slums.

The Brāhmans cannot behold them, and they are obliged to fly when they appear. Great care is taken not to eat anything dressed by a Paraiya, nor even to drink out of the vessel he has used; they dare not enter the house of an Indian of another caste; or, if they are employed in any work, a door is purposely made for them; but they must work with their eyes on the ground; for, if it is perceived they have glanced at the kitchen, all the utensils must be broken.

Ananda replies, ‘I didn’t ask for your caste’ ‘I asked for some water’

In 1927, Ambedkar launched a satyagraha to allow untouchables to use water in a public tank in Mahad (currently in Raigad district), Maharashtra, India.

Even today a lot of villages only have common wells and ponds. Not every rural house has a well.

The story goes like this : Parched in the hot sun, Ananda approached a girl fetching water and asks her for water.